data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49699/49699e4a0c1ed09dd5b5a44ef704caea5f2aa90c" alt="Use windows defender and avast"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/456ff/456ff8e9e546d179ca79c0020445e4ab84e5fac5" alt="use windows defender and avast use windows defender and avast"
These two have existed in Windows Defender for years and Microsoft never ever bothered to fix or improve them. This goes to scan engine speed as well as Folder Access Control. I just can't understand it how they can bake in a feature and not bother improving it. Meanwhile avast! is using same approach and its whitelist only triggered manual alert twice in years. It keeps on blocking legit apps from accessing protected folders. They allegedly have a whitelist for it but I never ever seen it actually work. Also Windows Defender's Folder Access Control feature is pure garbage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fcef/3fcef9609ca6274eccb997eead747c9cf08915aa" alt="use windows defender and avast use windows defender and avast"
All other antiviruses never had such behavior. I've actually only experienced the same issue with Comodo. It's always slow as fuck on larger EXE files which just drives me insane because the lag is very noticeable. I see exactly the same behavior across the systems from low end Atom netbook with 2GB RAM and eMMC to Ryzen 2500U laptop with 8GB RAM and NVMe DRAMless SSD to a highly overclocked desktop with 32GB of RAM and super fast SATA SSD. It's just awful at scanning speed and while people keep on saying it's my system's fault I disagree. However my biggest issue with it is that it's engine just sucks ass when it comes to performance. Windows Defender on the other hand has been pretty mediocre and has relatively recently improved to a point where I don't see a reason why one wouldn't use it. People can argue their privacy practices, but their protection has been top level for a lot of years now. And as much as people hate it, avast!/AVG does too. Unexpectedly, Trend Micro is also a top performer for many recent years. Bitdefender has one of the best track records and has been consistently a top performer for many many years now. The only thing that can be done is avoid being low hanging fruit. No one can stay on top.Ĭomputers aren’t really capable of adequate security. The one that works best gets used most and therefore gets stuff written specifically to attack it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0471b/0471b4a7154573a48ab86923094336334661b9d3" alt="use windows defender and avast use windows defender and avast"
Companies do the work to get to the top of the pile and then attempt to coast.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bf34/9bf344ef2d3173784a9ecc05d22403fbe19fd9e6" alt="use windows defender and avast use windows defender and avast"
Back in the day it was even macfee for a while. It’s been bitdefender, it’s been avast, it’s been malware bytes. The issue is which software is “most effective” changes frequently.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49699/49699e4a0c1ed09dd5b5a44ef704caea5f2aa90c" alt="Use windows defender and avast"